forked from scikit-learn/scikit-learn
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
ENH Adds TargetEncoder (scikit-learn#25334)
Co-authored-by: Andreas Mueller <t3kcit@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Olivier Grisel <olivier.grisel@ensta.org> Co-authored-by: Jovan Stojanovic <62058944+jovan-stojanovic@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <g.lemaitre58@gmail.com>
- Loading branch information
1 parent
23f9694
commit d13af4c
Showing
11 changed files
with
1,394 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
Sorry, something went wrong. Reload?
Sorry, we cannot display this file.
Sorry, this file is invalid so it cannot be displayed.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ | ||
""" | ||
============================================ | ||
Comparing Target Encoder with Other Encoders | ||
============================================ | ||
.. currentmodule:: sklearn.preprocessing | ||
The :class:`TargetEncoder` uses the value of the target to encode each | ||
categorical feature. In this example, we will compare three different approaches | ||
for handling categorical features: :class:`TargetEncoder`, | ||
:class:`OrdinalEncoder`, :class:`OneHotEncoder` and dropping the category. | ||
.. note:: | ||
`fit(X, y).transform(X)` does not equal `fit_transform(X, y)` because a | ||
cross-validation scheme is used in `fit_transform` for encoding. See the | ||
:ref:`User Guide <target_encoder>`. for details. | ||
""" | ||
|
||
# %% | ||
# Loading Data from OpenML | ||
# ======================== | ||
# First, we load the wine reviews dataset, where the target is the points given | ||
# be a reviewer: | ||
from sklearn.datasets import fetch_openml | ||
|
||
wine_reviews = fetch_openml(data_id=42074, as_frame=True, parser="pandas") | ||
|
||
df = wine_reviews.frame | ||
df.head() | ||
|
||
# %% | ||
# For this example, we use the following subset of numerical and categorical | ||
# features in the data. The target are continuous values from 80 to 100: | ||
numerical_features = ["price"] | ||
categorical_features = [ | ||
"country", | ||
"province", | ||
"region_1", | ||
"region_2", | ||
"variety", | ||
"winery", | ||
] | ||
target_name = "points" | ||
|
||
X = df[numerical_features + categorical_features] | ||
y = df[target_name] | ||
|
||
_ = y.hist() | ||
|
||
# %% | ||
# Training and Evaluating Pipelines with Different Encoders | ||
# ========================================================= | ||
# In this section, we will evaluate pipelines with | ||
# :class:`~sklearn.ensemble.HistGradientBoostingRegressor` with different encoding | ||
# strategies. First, we list out the encoders we will be using to preprocess | ||
# the categorical features: | ||
from sklearn.compose import ColumnTransformer | ||
from sklearn.preprocessing import OrdinalEncoder | ||
from sklearn.preprocessing import OneHotEncoder | ||
from sklearn.preprocessing import TargetEncoder | ||
|
||
categorical_preprocessors = [ | ||
("drop", "drop"), | ||
("ordinal", OrdinalEncoder(handle_unknown="use_encoded_value", unknown_value=-1)), | ||
( | ||
"one_hot", | ||
OneHotEncoder(handle_unknown="ignore", max_categories=20, sparse_output=False), | ||
), | ||
("target", TargetEncoder(target_type="continuous")), | ||
] | ||
|
||
# %% | ||
# Next, we evaluate the models using cross validation and record the results: | ||
from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline | ||
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_validate | ||
from sklearn.ensemble import HistGradientBoostingRegressor | ||
|
||
n_cv_folds = 3 | ||
max_iter = 20 | ||
results = [] | ||
|
||
|
||
def evaluate_model_and_store(name, pipe): | ||
result = cross_validate( | ||
pipe, | ||
X, | ||
y, | ||
scoring="neg_root_mean_squared_error", | ||
cv=n_cv_folds, | ||
return_train_score=True, | ||
) | ||
rmse_test_score = -result["test_score"] | ||
rmse_train_score = -result["train_score"] | ||
results.append( | ||
{ | ||
"preprocessor": name, | ||
"rmse_test_mean": rmse_test_score.mean(), | ||
"rmse_test_std": rmse_train_score.std(), | ||
"rmse_train_mean": rmse_train_score.mean(), | ||
"rmse_train_std": rmse_train_score.std(), | ||
} | ||
) | ||
|
||
|
||
for name, categorical_preprocessor in categorical_preprocessors: | ||
preprocessor = ColumnTransformer( | ||
[ | ||
("numerical", "passthrough", numerical_features), | ||
("categorical", categorical_preprocessor, categorical_features), | ||
] | ||
) | ||
pipe = make_pipeline( | ||
preprocessor, HistGradientBoostingRegressor(random_state=0, max_iter=max_iter) | ||
) | ||
evaluate_model_and_store(name, pipe) | ||
|
||
|
||
# %% | ||
# Native Categorical Feature Support | ||
# ================================== | ||
# In this section, we build and evaluate a pipeline that uses native categorical | ||
# feature support in :class:`~sklearn.ensemble.HistGradientBoostingRegressor`, | ||
# which only supports up to 255 unique categories. In our dataset, the most of | ||
# the categorical features have more than 255 unique categories: | ||
n_unique_categories = df[categorical_features].nunique().sort_values(ascending=False) | ||
n_unique_categories | ||
|
||
# %% | ||
# To workaround the limitation above, we group the categorical features into | ||
# low cardinality and high cardinality features. The high cardinality features | ||
# will be target encoded and the low cardinality features will use the native | ||
# categorical feature in gradient boosting. | ||
high_cardinality_features = n_unique_categories[n_unique_categories > 255].index | ||
low_cardinality_features = n_unique_categories[n_unique_categories <= 255].index | ||
mixed_encoded_preprocessor = ColumnTransformer( | ||
[ | ||
("numerical", "passthrough", numerical_features), | ||
( | ||
"high_cardinality", | ||
TargetEncoder(target_type="continuous"), | ||
high_cardinality_features, | ||
), | ||
( | ||
"low_cardinality", | ||
OrdinalEncoder(handle_unknown="use_encoded_value", unknown_value=-1), | ||
low_cardinality_features, | ||
), | ||
], | ||
verbose_feature_names_out=False, | ||
) | ||
|
||
# The output of the of the preprocessor must be set to pandas so the | ||
# gradient boosting model can detect the low cardinality features. | ||
mixed_encoded_preprocessor.set_output(transform="pandas") | ||
mixed_pipe = make_pipeline( | ||
mixed_encoded_preprocessor, | ||
HistGradientBoostingRegressor( | ||
random_state=0, max_iter=max_iter, categorical_features=low_cardinality_features | ||
), | ||
) | ||
mixed_pipe | ||
|
||
# %% | ||
# Finally, we evaluate the pipeline using cross validation and record the results: | ||
evaluate_model_and_store("mixed_target", mixed_pipe) | ||
|
||
# %% | ||
# Plotting the Results | ||
# ==================== | ||
# In this section, we display the results by plotting the test and train scores: | ||
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt | ||
import pandas as pd | ||
|
||
results_df = ( | ||
pd.DataFrame(results).set_index("preprocessor").sort_values("rmse_test_mean") | ||
) | ||
|
||
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots( | ||
1, 2, figsize=(12, 8), sharey=True, constrained_layout=True | ||
) | ||
xticks = range(len(results_df)) | ||
name_to_color = dict( | ||
zip((r["preprocessor"] for r in results), ["C0", "C1", "C2", "C3", "C4"]) | ||
) | ||
|
||
for subset, ax in zip(["test", "train"], [ax1, ax2]): | ||
mean, std = f"rmse_{subset}_mean", f"rmse_{subset}_std" | ||
data = results_df[[mean, std]].sort_values(mean) | ||
ax.bar( | ||
x=xticks, | ||
height=data[mean], | ||
yerr=data[std], | ||
width=0.9, | ||
color=[name_to_color[name] for name in data.index], | ||
) | ||
ax.set( | ||
title=f"RMSE ({subset.title()})", | ||
xlabel="Encoding Scheme", | ||
xticks=xticks, | ||
xticklabels=data.index, | ||
) | ||
|
||
# %% | ||
# When evaluating the predictive performance on the test set, dropping the | ||
# categories perform the worst and the target encoders performs the best. This | ||
# can be explained as follows: | ||
# | ||
# - Dropping the categorical features makes the pipeline less expressive and | ||
# underfitting as a result; | ||
# - Due to the high cardinality and to reduce the training time, the one-hot | ||
# encoding scheme uses `max_categories=20` which prevents the features from | ||
# expanding too much, which can result in underfitting. | ||
# - If we had not set `max_categories=20`, the one-hot encoding scheme would have | ||
# likely made the pipeline overfitting as the number of features explodes with rare | ||
# category occurrences that are correlated with the target by chance (on the training | ||
# set only); | ||
# - The ordinal encoding imposes an arbitrary order to the features which are then | ||
# treated as numerical values by the | ||
# :class:`~sklearn.ensemble.HistGradientBoostingRegressor`. Since this | ||
# model groups numerical features in 256 bins per feature, many unrelated categories | ||
# can be grouped together and as a result overall pipeline can underfit; | ||
# - When using the target encoder, the same binning happens, but since the encoded | ||
# values are statistically ordered by marginal association with the target variable, | ||
# the binning use by the :class:`~sklearn.ensemble.HistGradientBoostingRegressor` | ||
# makes sense and leads to good results: the combination of smoothed target | ||
# encoding and binning works as a good regularizing strategy against | ||
# overfitting while not limiting the expressiveness of the pipeline too much. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.