deps!: migrate plugins to genkit 0.9.0

[EPMatt]

Copied from #155.

Before you submit a pull request, please make sure you have read and understood the contribution guidelines and the code of conduct.

This pull request is related to:

• A bug
• A new feature
• Documentation
• Other: The next version of Genkit (0.9) has many breaking changes for the plugin API. This PR migrates some 3P plugins to 0.9.

I have checked the following:

• I have read and understood the contribution guidelines and the code of conduct;
• I have added new tests (for bug fixes/features);
• I have added/updated the documentation (for bug fixes / features).

Description:
Migrate several 3P plugins to 0.9
Related issues:
firebase/genkit#1088

[EPMatt]

@all-contributors add @cabljac as code, tests and documentation contributor

[allcontributors]

@EPMatt

I've put up a pull request to add @cabljac! 🎉

[cabljac]

hm seems like groq tests are failing, want me to go in and fix?

[EPMatt]

@cabljac didn't see your comment - I was already on it. Thank you again for your contribution! 🔥

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
45.7% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarQube for IDE

[xavidop]

do to a regression failure, you will need to modify the function that transforms the GenkitRequest into OpenAI/Claude/Groq/etc Request. The way we were detecting the format json/text has changed and it is no longer under: request.output?.format it is now under: request.output?.contentType check my plugin for reference:https://github.com/xavidop/genkitx-github/blob/8d9afd06416e5138708653be51ec3924d983ef12/src/github_llms.ts#L727

[EPMatt]

@xavidop thanks for sharing! Would you be up to push your suggested changes here? It looks like it could be a quick task, as you also already implemented the regression fix in your plugins.

[xavidop]

@xavidop thanks for sharing! Would you be up to push your suggested changes here? It looks like it could be a quick task, as you also already implemented the regression fix in your plugins.

@EPMatt sure thing, should I commit in this branch or create a new branch + another PR?

[EPMatt]

@xavidop amazing, please make a new PR based on top of this.
Given the urgency of the update, I'm gonna to bypass sonarcloud and merge this with a note to plugin maintainers to improve test coverage in the future. It looks like some plugins even don't have tests configured.

Thanks to all the people involved in this PR for contributing!

[xavidop]

@EPMatt #161