New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve discoverability of nuget packages #9146
Conversation
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. However, I found this, which claims that we no longer need the .nuspec
file. Did you look into that?
Right now, the tags are duplicated, which is not optimal.
I was not able to find more references. Anyway, nuspec tags where already there, I just extended the list. I think we can keep it like this for now, the duplication (if any) should not be that big of a deal anyway in my opinion |
Quality Gate passed for 'SonarAnalyzer for .NET'Issues Measures |
Quality Gate passed for 'Sonar .NET Java Plugin'Issues Measures |
The search "sonar dotnet" only reports the scanner, whereas "sonar" also returns the CSharp analyzer in the first position.
Adding more tags would help discoverability on nuget.org.
See original ticket here.
Tested in https://int.nugettest.org/
Resources: