New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DON'T MERGE] Review additional coding style suggestions #8347
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
||
Single variable lambdas should use `x` as the variable name (based on lambda calculus λx). Multi variable lambdas should use descriptive names, where `x` can be used for the main iterated item like `(x, index) => ...`. Name `c` can be used for context of Roslyn callback. | ||
|
||
Short names can be used as parameter and variable names, namely `SyntaxTree tree`, `SemanticModel model`, `SyntaxNode node` and `CancellationToken cancel`. | ||
|
||
### Method names | ||
|
||
FIXME Avoid Get prefixes for method names. Save three characters when it only gets x.Foo.Bar. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would suggest to vote about this one in the 4th step of our process.
Unit tests for common C# and VB.NET rules should use two aliases `using CS = SonarAnalyzer.Rules.CSharp` and `using VB = SonarAnalyzer.Rules.VisualBasic`. Test method names should have `_CS` and `_VB` suffixes. | ||
|
||
Unit tests for single language rule should not use alias nor language method suffix. | ||
|
||
Variable name `sut` (System Under Test) is recommended in unit tests that really tests a single unit (contrary to our usual rule integration unit tests). | ||
|
||
FIXME - Avoid names without meaning like `foo`, `bar`, `baz`. OR KISS? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would suggest to vote about this one in the 4th step of our process.
|
||
Unit test method names: | ||
- Underscore in UT names separates logical groups, not individual words. | ||
- FIXME: what should the name pattern be? NEEDS DISCUSSION ([many patterns](https://dzone.com/articles/7-popular-unit-test-naming) and also [Microsoft convention](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/testing/unit-testing-best-practices#naming-your-tests) - I'd go for MS convention) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would suggest to vote about this one in the 4th step of our process.
{ "there": 42 }, | ||
} | ||
``` | ||
* FIXME - align on how to use collection initializers int[] x = [ 1, 2, 3 ] or old style (see [slack discussion](https://sonarsource.slack.com/archives/C01H2B58DE1/p1697103918957899?thread_ts=1696951023.295859&cid=C01H2B58DE1)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would suggest to vote about this one in the 4th step of our process.
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! |
{ "hey" : 1 }, | ||
{ "there": 42 }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wrong sytnax.
{ "hey" : 1 }, | |
{ "there": 42 }, | |
["hey"] = 1, | |
["there"] = 42 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's my typo, sorry for that Andrei.
And Tim, the one I wanted to suggest is this one:
var dict = new Dictionary<int,int>
{
{ 1, 2 },
{ 3, 4 },
};
|
||
## Comments | ||
|
||
* Code should contain as few comments as necessary in favor of well-named members and variables. | ||
* Comments should generally be on separate lines. | ||
* Comments on the same line with code are acceptable for short lines of code and short comments. | ||
* Documentation comments for abstract methods and their implementations should be placed only on the abstract method, to avoid duplication. _When reading the implementation, the IDE offers the tooling to peek in the base class and read the method comment._ | ||
* Avoid using comments for "Arrange, Act, Assert" in UTs, unless the test is complex. | ||
* Use single-line comments. Exception: `Internal /* for testing */ void Something()`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The naming here is confusing since this is a single line.
* Use single-line comments. Exception: `Internal /* for testing */ void Something()`. | |
* Use double-slash comments only. Exception: `Internal /* for testing */ void Something()`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or maybe rather "Do not use /* ... */
."
|
||
* When to factorize: two is a group, three is a crowd. | ||
* Less is more. | ||
* Rely on Roslyn Type inference to reduce used characters. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What do you mean by "used characters"?
@@ -218,6 +285,15 @@ It can still be used when and where it makes sense. For instance, when a class h | |||
implementing generic interfaces (such as `IComparable`, `IDisposable`), it can make sense to have regions | |||
for the implementation of these interfaces. | |||
|
|||
## Spacing | |||
|
|||
* Avoid spaces unless they bring clarity and help the reader understand logical groups. Prefer spaces over comments. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By spaces you mean newlines?
It's a bit confusing, someone might read this as using new int[]{1,2,3}
instead of new int[] { 1, 2, 3 }
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, empty lines, I will update
No description provided.