GH Actions/basics: add check for valid XML docs + fix two docs #674
+7
−3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Verify basic well-formedness of the XML docs.
* The `HereNowdocIdentifierSpacing` one contained unescaped special chars in an attribute (oops). * The `SpreadOperatorSpacingAfter` line length did not conform (not found via the new CI check, but even so).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Of course, found this issue when I'd already tagged the 3.11.0 release... oh well, guess I'll do another release later this week. At least with the new CI check, this won't be able to happen again.
GH Actions/basics: add check for valid XML docs
Verify basic well-formedness of the XML docs.
Docs: fix up two XML docs
HereNowdocIdentifierSpacingone contained unescaped special chars in an attribute (oops).SpreadOperatorSpacingAfterline length did not conform (not found via the new CI check, but even so).Suggested changelog entry
Related issues/external references
Introduced in #586
Types of changes