Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python311Packages.pycryptodome: 3.17.0 -> 3.18.0 #242428

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

fabaff
Copy link
Member

@fabaff fabaff commented Jul 9, 2023

Diff: Legrandin/pycryptodome@refs/tags/v3.17.0...v3.18.0

Changelog: https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome/blob/v3.18.0/Changelog.rst

Description of changes
Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@fabaff
Copy link
Member Author

fabaff commented Jul 9, 2023

@ofborg build python311Packages.pycryptodome python311Packages.pycryptodomex python311Packages.unicrypto

@blaggacao
Copy link
Contributor

changelog looks rather inocuous

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Included in #244135

Python batch upgrade automation moved this from In progress to Done Jul 18, 2023
@fabaff fabaff deleted the pycryptodome-bump branch January 14, 2024 09:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants