Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support reading litellm proxy response cost header in sdk + support setting lower ssl security level #9330

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 18, 2025

Conversation

krrishdholakia
Copy link
Contributor

@krrishdholakia krrishdholakia commented Mar 18, 2025

Title

Relevant issues

  • allows consistent cost tracking when sdk is calling proxy
  • Allows user to specify lower security settings

Pre-Submission checklist

Please complete all items before asking a LiteLLM maintainer to review your PR

  • I have Added testing in the tests/litellm/ directory, Adding at least 1 test is a hard requirement - see details
  • I have added a screenshot of my new test passing locally
  • My PR passes all unit tests on (make test-unit)[https://docs.litellm.ai/docs/extras/contributing_code]
  • My PR's scope is as isolated as possible, it only solves 1 specific problem

Type

🆕 New Feature
🐛 Bug Fix
🧹 Refactoring
📖 Documentation
🚄 Infrastructure
✅ Test

Changes

Sorry, something went wrong.

…r in client sdk

allows consistent cost tracking when sdk is calling proxy
Allows user to specify lower security settings
…e on cache hit
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 18, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
litellm ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 18, 2025 2:57am

@krrishdholakia krrishdholakia merged commit 27768a4 into main Mar 18, 2025
37 of 38 checks passed
@krrishdholakia krrishdholakia changed the title Litellm dev 03 17 2025 p1 Support reading litellm proxy response cost header in sdk + support setting lower ssl security level Mar 18, 2025
@krrishdholakia krrishdholakia deleted the litellm_dev_03_17_2025_p1 branch March 23, 2025 00:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant