Skip to content

Solve the problem of insufficient width of Y-axis label display #212

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 16, 2024

Conversation

weilanxiao
Copy link

No description provided.

@hannesa2
Copy link
Collaborator

Some screenshot tests are failing, but maybe it's ok, because you changed something.
The annoying thing is, that you have to download diff files in pull request summary, for investigation.

To avoid this, I made #213 here you see diff immediate in pull request as comment.

@weilanxiao Please rebase this pull request to recent master, then we can see diffs immediate

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
@weilanxiao weilanxiao force-pushed the fix_y_label_width branch from 67c6941 to 5bc6609 Compare May 16, 2024 02:43
@weilanxiao
Copy link
Author

Hello, I created a new branch based on the latest master where the commit is 12fa970f, and then picked the original commits to the new branch. Finally, I forcefully pushed to fix_y_label_width. Is this operation correct?

@hannesa2
Copy link
Collaborator

hannesa2 commented May 16, 2024

The new branch was an extra unneeded task, but the result is fine
The easiest way to rebase would be:

git fetch upstream
git checkout fix_y_label_width
git rebase upstream/master
git push -f

@hannesa2
Copy link
Collaborator

hannesa2 commented May 16, 2024

Now I started the CI pipeline and I expect failing screenshot test, because I already tested this branch concerning screenshot tests #216 and there is already a fix be47f36
I don't want to merge my pull request, because then I'm in the history as creator of this fix. I don't want to grab the honor of your fix, so I help you to fix, to habe the honor on your side.

A:

To fix it, the most easy step is to cherry-pick be47f36 to your pull request.

B:

A more complicated way it to grab new screenshots from failing CI pipeline and replace in directory screenshotsToCompare with these new artifacts

C:

I simply merge #216 but then you are not the creator of this fix in changelog

@hannesa2
Copy link
Collaborator

Btw, I see my screenshot pipeline don't find secret CLASSIC_TOKEN for pull request form a fork, that's why the screenshot diffs are not pushed to this pull request, compared to #216

@hannesa2
Copy link
Collaborator

A:

To fix it, the most easy step is to cherry-pick be47f36 to your pull request.

I did this, because I can push to a branch of your repository

@weilanxiao
Copy link
Author

How should I add CLASSIC_TOKEN through this check?

@hannesa2
Copy link
Collaborator

How should I add CLASSIC_TOKEN through this check?

No action required. Build is green
Thank you !

@hannesa2 hannesa2 merged commit 8bea117 into AppDevNext:master May 16, 2024
2 checks passed
@hannesa2 hannesa2 added the enhancement New feature or request label May 16, 2024
@weilanxiao
Copy link
Author

Thank you

@hannesa2
Copy link
Collaborator

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants