Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: updated to actions/upload-artifact v4 #574

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 11, 2024

Conversation

ErikBjare
Copy link
Member

@ErikBjare ErikBjare commented May 11, 2024

Fixes #560

Works around actions/upload-artifact#478


🚀 This description was created by Ellipsis for commit 57c378b

Summary:

Updated GitHub Actions workflows to use actions/upload-artifact@v4, enhancing artifact management and naming in CI processes.

Key points:

  • Updated actions/upload-artifact to v4 in /github/workflows/comment.yml and /github/workflows/nodejs.yml.
  • Modified artifact handling in comment.yml to include unzipping and cleanup within the script.
  • Introduced dynamic naming of artifacts in nodejs.yml based on matrix variables.

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to 326e564 in 1 minute and 26 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 53 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_NGv07vHFqO16fU8a


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

9 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

});
var fs = require('fs');
fs.writeFileSync(`${{github.workspace}}/${artifact.name}.zip`, Buffer.from(download.data));
}

- run: unzip -d screenshots screenshots.zip
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The unzip command attempts to unzip a file named 'screenshots.zip', but the artifacts are now dynamically named and saved as individual zip files. This will cause the unzip step to fail. Consider updating this step to handle multiple zip files or adjust the naming convention to ensure the correct file is targeted.

Suggested change
- run: unzip -d screenshots screenshots.zip
# Adjust this command to handle the new naming convention or process multiple zip files.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 26.15%. Comparing base (021acc4) to head (57c378b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #574   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   26.15%   26.15%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        1629     1629           
  Branches      285      285           
=======================================
  Hits          426      426           
+ Misses       1177     1145   -32     
- Partials       26       58   +32     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ErikBjare
Copy link
Member Author

ErikBjare commented May 11, 2024

Needs to be merged before changes to the comment workflow are used, unlike: https://github.com/ActivityWatch/aw-webui/actions/runs/9044104886

Copy link

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 57c378b in 1 minute and 54 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 30 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/comment.yml:53
  • Draft comment:
    Consider using asynchronous methods such as child_process.exec or promises with util.promisify to handle the unzipping process. This will prevent blocking the Node.js event loop and potentially improve the performance of the workflow.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence of 0% on close inspection, compared to threshold of 50%.

Workflow ID: wflow_I3WujMcskAmmqrw1


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

9 days left in your free trial, upgrade for $20/seat/month or contact us.

@ErikBjare ErikBjare merged commit 854b116 into master May 11, 2024
8 checks passed
@ErikBjare ErikBjare deleted the dev/update-upload-artifact-action branch May 11, 2024 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant