Migrate from FindBugs to SpotBugs

[krzyk]

Findbugs project is dead, let's migrate to its successor - SpotBugs

[krzyk]

@0crat in

[0crat]

@0crat in (here)

@krzyk Job #884 is now in scope, role is DEV

[0crat]

Bug was reported, see §29: +15 point(s) just awarded to @krzyk/z

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at #884; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #884; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #884; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #884; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #884; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[ThrawnCA]

@krzyk Um...I'm not exactly sure how this zerocracy is supposed to operate, but is it actually possible for someone to work on this issue, or are they going to be hunted down by a Terminator bot for stepping outside the rules?

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #884; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[krzyk]

@ThrawnCA I (and every architect in project) can assign tasks manually to someone. But in qulice there are no funds so the work will be for free, you can get 30 reputation points if you are registered in zerocracy.

[ThrawnCA]

Doesn't manual assignment cost you reputation points, though?

(I'm not registered, no. Interesting system.)

[krzyk]

@ThrawnCA Yes it does.

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #884; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #884; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #884; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #884; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

The job #884 assigned to @paulodamaso/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[ThrawnCA]

@paulodamaso If you need any pointers on this, I'm happy to help. The new artifact is com.github.spotbugs:spotbugs, latest version is 3.1.9.

[0pdd]

@krzyk the puzzle #959 is still not solved.

[paulodamaso]

@ThrawnCA Thanks for the tip, I implemented the skeleton and tests for SpotBugs checks.

[paulodamaso]

@krzyk Merged, please close

[krzyk]

@paulodamaso thanks

[0crat]

Job was finished in 34 hours, bonus for fast delivery is possible (see §36)

[0crat]

@ypshenychka/z please review this job completed by @paulodamaso/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

[0crat]

The job #884 is now out of scope

[ypshenychka]

@0crat quality good

[0crat]

@0crat quality good (here)

@ypshenychka The project doesn't have enough funds, can't make a payment

[0crat]

Order was finished, quality is "good": +40 point(s) just awarded to @paulodamaso/z

[0crat]

Quality review completed: +8 point(s) just awarded to @ypshenychka/z