Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use compiler.inputFileSystem to make thread-loader work with memfs #94

Open
dmnsgn opened this issue Jul 14, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Use compiler.inputFileSystem to make thread-loader work with memfs #94

dmnsgn opened this issue Jul 14, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@dmnsgn
Copy link

dmnsgn commented Jul 14, 2020

I couldn't make thread-loader open an entry file from memory system as it yielding the following error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open. I assume it has to do with the fact worker.js uses fs https://github.com/webpack-contrib/thread-loader/blob/master/src/worker.js#L3.

Would using _compiler.inputFileSystem or allowing an option to specify a in-memory file system in the loader allow that?

Repro below (create the package.json/index.js and run npm test):

package.json

{
  "name": "webpack-thread-loader-memfs",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "main": "index.js",
  "scripts": {
    "test": "node index.js"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "memfs": "^3.2.0",
    "thread-loader": "^2.1.3",
    "unionfs": "^4.4.0",
    "webpack": "^4.43.0",
    "webpack-cli": "^3.3.12"
  }
}

index.js

const fs = require("fs");
const path = require("path");
const webpack = require("webpack");
const { Union } = require("unionfs");
const { createFsFromVolume, Volume } = require("memfs");

const entry = path.join(__dirname, "entry.js");

const memoryFs = createFsFromVolume(new Volume());
memoryFs.join = path.join.bind(path);
const ufs = new Union();
ufs.use(fs).use(memoryFs);

memoryFs.mkdirpSync(__dirname);
memoryFs.writeFileSync(entry, `console.log('entry')`, "utf8");

const config = {
  entry,
  output: {
    filename: "bundle.js",
    path: __dirname,
  },
  mode: "production",
  module: {
    rules: [
      {
        test: /\.(js|jsx)$/,
        exclude: /node_modules/,
        use: [{ loader: require.resolve("thread-loader") }],
      },
    ],
  },
};

const compiler = webpack(config);
compiler.inputFileSystem = ufs;

compiler.run((error, stats) => {
  console.log(
    stats.toString({
      chunks: false,
      entrypoints: false,
      hash: false,
      version: false,
      modules: false,
      colors: true,
    })
  );
});

Output

ERROR in ./entry.js
Module build failed (from ./node_modules/thread-loader/dist/cjs.js):
Thread Loader (Worker 0)
ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/Users/path-to-project/webpack-thread-loader-memfs/entry.js'
    at PoolWorker.fromErrorObj (/Users/path-to-project/webpack-thread-loader-memfs/node_modules/thread-loader/dist/WorkerPool.js:262:12)
    at /Users/path-to-project/webpack-thread-loader-memfs/node_modules/thread-loader/dist/WorkerPool.js:204:29
    at mapSeries (/Users/path-to-project/webpack-thread-loader-memfs/node_modules/neo-async/async.js:3625:14)
    at PoolWorker.onWorkerMessage (/Users/path-to-project/webpack-thread-loader-memfs/node_modules/thread-loader/dist/WorkerPool.js:170:35)
    at /Users/path-to-project/webpack-thread-loader-memfs/node_modules/thread-loader/dist/WorkerPool.js:152:14
    at Socket.onChunk (/Users/path-to-project/webpack-thread-loader-memfs/node_modules/thread-loader/dist/readBuffer.js:36:9)
    at Socket.emit (events.js:315:20)
    at Socket.Readable.read (_stream_readable.js:513:10)
    at Socket.read (net.js:623:39)
    at flow (_stream_readable.js:986:34)
    at emitReadable_ (_stream_readable.js:577:3)
    at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:83:21)
@jsg2021
Copy link

jsg2021 commented Nov 8, 2020

I am very interested in this as well... it would probably have to stub fs and proxy them to the parent process.

@jsg2021
Copy link

jsg2021 commented Nov 21, 2020

@evilebottnawi @Mesoptier thoughts on this?

@jsg2021
Copy link

jsg2021 commented Nov 21, 2020

I'm wondering if the fs API surface could be proxied to the parent process or at least the methods explicitly defined in the input file system wrapper.

@alexander-akait
Copy link
Member

@jsg2021 we can create wrapper for fs calls, like we do it for getResolve

@jslq
Copy link

jslq commented Aug 11, 2021

not resovled yet?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants