Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JSpecify test case for generic methods #918

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

msridhar
Copy link
Collaborator

@msridhar msridhar commented Feb 23, 2024

Based on an internal issue. When we get to supporting generic methods in JSpecify we want to be able to handle this case. The test is ignored for now.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.08%. Comparing base (3fc9b8a) to head (8caf50c).
Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #918      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     86.98%   87.08%   +0.10%     
- Complexity     1959     1989      +30     
============================================
  Files            77       77              
  Lines          6330     6426      +96     
  Branches       1223     1244      +21     
============================================
+ Hits           5506     5596      +90     
- Misses          420      422       +2     
- Partials        404      408       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@yuxincs yuxincs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Test addition (although currently not supported) LGTM :)

@msridhar msridhar merged commit 3a3d8e7 into uber:master Feb 23, 2024
12 checks passed
@msridhar msridhar deleted the jspecify-generic-method-test branch February 23, 2024 18:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants