Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Enhancement: Finalize naming for EXPERIMENTAL_useProjectService #9003

Closed
JoshuaKGoldberg opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Enhancement: Finalize naming for EXPERIMENTAL_useProjectService #9003

JoshuaKGoldberg opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Milestone
8.0.0

Comments

@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member

Overview

We've been using the name EXPERIMENTAL_useProjectService to explicitly indicate it's an experimental option. But we're going to be promoting it to stable in v8. That means we'll need to figure out the proper name for it.

#8031 has some existing discussion. Filing this issue to track solidifying the name.
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the package: parser Issues related to @typescript-eslint/parser label Apr 26, 2024
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added this to the 8.0.0 milestone Apr 26, 2024
@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member Author

Duplicate of #9004. GitHub had an error.

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Apr 26, 2024
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added duplicate This issue or pull request already exists and removed package: parser Issues related to @typescript-eslint/parser triage Waiting for maintainers to take a look labels Apr 26, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 5, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Milestone
8.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@JoshuaKGoldberg