Stage 3 Criteria

[ljharb]

Reopening #19.

• Flesh out the motivation section
• Spec Text (Convert to static factory methods #47)
• update test262 tests (PR)
• merge test262 tests
• open issues
  • Static method naming #57
• Reviewers
  • @bakkot
  • @syg
  • @msaboff
• Editors
  • @michaelficarra

[michaelficarra]

Approved.

[nickmccurdy]

Does this mean it's already stage 3, or is it still blocked by review?

[ljharb]

@nickmccurdy that means one reviewer approves it. Only plenary can advance stages.

[bricss]

Those who would like to track 🔍 implementation progress, here is the link 🔗

[ljharb]

Thanks - that’s just one implementation, but I’ll add it to the stage 4 criteria issue once the proposal is stage 3 :-)

[syg]

Spec lgtm normatively and editorially.

One editorial nit is I'd prefer the coercion parameter in GroupBy to be renamed keyCoercion.

[ljharb]

Nit fixed in 90c5724

[ljharb]

Stage 3 was approved today, conditional on the remaining review.

[msaboff]

Spec lgtm as well.

[ljharb]

→ #60