Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Document cron-vs-quartz parsing convention for dayOfWeek part in CronExpression #32131

Closed
github-actions bot opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Document cron-vs-quartz parsing convention for dayOfWeek part in CronExpression #32131

github-actions bot opened this issue Jan 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@jhoeller
Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) type: backport An issue that is a backport of another issue to a maintenance branch type: documentation A documentation task
Milestone
5.3.32

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link

Backport of gh-32128
@github-actions github-actions bot added in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) type: backport An issue that is a backport of another issue to a maintenance branch type: bug A general bug labels Jan 26, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 5.3.32 milestone Jan 26, 2024
@jhoeller jhoeller self-assigned this Jan 26, 2024
@jhoeller jhoeller changed the title CronExpression wrong parsing of quartz specific expression Document cron-vs-quartz parsing convention for dayOfWeek part in CronExpression Jan 26, 2024
@jhoeller jhoeller added type: documentation A documentation task and removed type: bug A general bug labels Jan 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jhoeller jhoeller

Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) type: backport An issue that is a backport of another issue to a maintenance branch type: documentation A documentation task
Projects
None yet
Milestone
5.3.32
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jhoeller