Skip to content

FileSystemUtils::deleteRecursively Javadoc refers to File instead of Path #30555

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
snicoll opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

FileSystemUtils::deleteRecursively Javadoc refers to File instead of Path #30555

snicoll opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@snicoll
Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) type: backport An issue that is a backport of another issue to a maintenance branch type: documentation A documentation task
Milestone
5.3.28

Comments

@snicoll
Copy link
Member

snicoll commented May 30, 2023

Backport of #30554
@snicoll snicoll added the type: documentation A documentation task label May 30, 2023
@snicoll snicoll added this to the 5.3.28 milestone May 30, 2023
@snicoll snicoll self-assigned this May 30, 2023
snicoll added a commit that referenced this issue May 30, 2023
@snicoll
Merge branch 'gh-30555' into 5.3.x
d9de36b 
Closes gh-30555
@snicoll
Copy link
Member Author

snicoll commented May 30, 2023

Fixed by d9de36b

@snicoll snicoll closed this as completed May 30, 2023
@jhoeller jhoeller added type: backport An issue that is a backport of another issue to a maintenance branch in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) labels May 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@snicoll snicoll

Labels
in: core Issues in core modules (aop, beans, core, context, expression) type: backport An issue that is a backport of another issue to a maintenance branch type: documentation A documentation task
Projects
None yet
Milestone
5.3.28
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@snicoll @jhoeller