Skip to content

Property metadata for "logging.structured.json.customizer" has incorrect type #43916

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
philwebb opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 1 comment
Closed

Property metadata for "logging.structured.json.customizer" has incorrect type #43916

philwebb opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
@wilkinsona
Labels
type: bug A general bug
Milestone
3.4.2

Comments

@philwebb
Copy link
Member

As spotted by @nosan #43201 (comment)
@philwebb philwebb added the type: bug A general bug label Jan 21, 2025
@philwebb philwebb added this to the 3.4.x milestone Jan 21, 2025
@philwebb philwebb changed the title "logging.structured.json.customizer" property metadata is incorrect Property metadata for "logging.structured.json.customizer" has incorrect type Jan 21, 2025
@philwebb philwebb mentioned this issue Jan 21, 2025
Closed
@snicoll
Copy link
Member

snicoll commented Jan 21, 2025

It could be constrained to the interface as well.

@wilkinsona wilkinsona self-assigned this Jan 22, 2025
@wilkinsona wilkinsona mentioned this issue Jan 22, 2025
Closed
@wilkinsona wilkinsona modified the milestones: 3.4.x, 3.4.2 Jan 22, 2025
@Netyyyy Netyyyy mentioned this issue Jan 24, 2025
Merged
arefbehboudi pushed a commit to arefbehboudi/spring-boot that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2025
@wilkinsona @arefbehboudi
Correct the type of logging.structured.json.customizer
60f55fd 
Closes spring-projectsgh-43916

Signed-off-by: arefbehboudi <behboodiaref@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@wilkinsona wilkinsona

Labels
type: bug A general bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.4.2
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@snicoll @philwebb @wilkinsona