Release v2.3.0

[lan496]

Closes #384

After this PR is merged, I'll put v2.3.0-rc1 tag to the commit first. Then v2.3.0 tag.

List of merged PRs were generated by

gh pr list --state merged --search "merged:>2023-12-07" --json url,title,number | jq -r '.[] | "[[#\(.number)]](\(.url)) - \(.title)"' 

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (504164b) 83.71% compared to head (76af0b8) 83.71%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #404   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    83.71%   83.71%           
========================================
  Files           24       24           
  Lines         8205     8205           
========================================
  Hits          6869     6869           
  Misses        1336     1336           

Flag	Coverage Δ
c_api	77.50% <ø> (ø)
fortran_api	56.33% <ø> (ø)
python_api	79.94% <ø> (ø)
unit_tests	1.36% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[LecrisUT]

LGTM. Was just confirming that rc tags are working: https://github.com/LecrisUT/spglib/actions/runs/7676699614

[atztogo]

LGTM.

[lan496]

Let me try TestPyPI for practice.

gco develop
git pull upstream develop  
git tag v2.3.0-rc1 
git push upstream v2.3.0-rc1  

[lan496]

successfully uploaded to TestPyPI
https://test.pypi.org/project/spglib/2.3.0rc1/

[lan496]

git tag v2.3.0
git push upstream v2.3.0  

[LecrisUT]

🤔 never tested with 2 tags on same commit

[lan496]

It is rather my practice for the current CI 😌

[lan496]

v2.3.0 is released!
https://pypi.org/project/spglib/2.3.0/

[lan496]

Release note on GitHub
https://github.com/spglib/spglib/releases/tag/v2.3.0

[lan496]

The latest docs still point to v2.1.1.****?
https://spglib.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#

[LecrisUT]

Indeed, but stable points to the new tag. Maybe we can rename stable to latest and latest to develop, wdyt?

[lan496]

I've opened an issue for this.
#406