Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Drop test coverage for out of support .NET Core vers #1971

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 22, 2023

Conversation

bartelink
Copy link
Member

@bartelink bartelink commented Oct 21, 2023

Removes test coverage for unsupported fameworks per #1970

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">

<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFrameworks>netstandard2.1;netstandard2.0;net462</TargetFrameworks>
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can't think of a specific reason a NS2.1 variant would add value? Or is the aim to pull in the NS2.1 variant of the prod assembly? (And if that's the aim, should there be a net48 one added instead of removing this?)

@@ -28,10 +28,6 @@
<DisableImplicitFrameworkReferences>true</DisableImplicitFrameworkReferences>
</PropertyGroup>

<PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(TargetFramework)' == 'net47' ">
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

seems dead?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like it 👍

@bartelink bartelink changed the title Remove test coverage for out of support .NET Core versions chore: Drop test coverage for out of support .NET Core vers Oct 21, 2023
@nblumhardt nblumhardt merged commit a493ffd into serilog:dev Oct 22, 2023
1 check passed
@bartelink bartelink deleted the bartelink/tfms branch October 23, 2023 07:13
@nblumhardt nblumhardt mentioned this pull request Nov 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants