-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 564
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Method shouldNotBe(exist) throws NoSuchElementException for a non-existent SelenideApiumElement #2665
Comments
Reproducible without appium via Selenide test harness with the following test:
The culprit is here, where |
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 3, 2024
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 3, 2024
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 3, 2024
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 4, 2024
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 4, 2024
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 4, 2024
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 4, 2024
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 5, 2024
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 5, 2024
Sonar reported this regex as vulnerable: "Make sure the regex used here, which is vulnerable to polynomial runtime due to backtracking, cannot lead to denial of service."
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 5, 2024
Sonar reported this regex as vulnerable: "Make sure the regex used here, which is vulnerable to polynomial runtime due to backtracking, cannot lead to denial of service."
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2024
I think it's not a problem because the input doesn't comes from users, it comes from Selenium library. And this String has quite limited length.
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2024
Sonar reported this regex as vulnerable: "Make sure the regex used here, which is vulnerable to polynomial runtime due to backtracking, cannot lead to denial of service."
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2024
I think it's not a problem because the input doesn't comes from users, it comes from Selenium library. And this String has quite limited length.
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2024
Sonar reported this regex as vulnerable: "Make sure the regex used here, which is vulnerable to polynomial runtime due to backtracking, cannot lead to denial of service."
asolntsev
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2024
I think it's not a problem because the input doesn't comes from users, it comes from Selenium library. And this String has quite limited length.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The problem
Calling a method
$.shouldNot(exist)
on a non-existentSelenideAppiumElement
throws an error.Details
Tell us about your environment
Code To Reproduce Issue
FullStackTrace.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: