fix(deps): update dependency @sanity/insert-menu to v1.1.6

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
@sanity/insert-menu (source)	^1.1.5 -> ^1.1.6
@sanity/insert-menu (source)	1.1.5 -> 1.1.6

---

Release Notes

sanity-io/visual-editing (@​sanity/insert-menu)

v1.1.6

Bug Fixes

• deps: update react compiler dependencies 🤖 ✨ (#​2827) (a72e9b8)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by . View repository job log here

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Mar 17, 2025 10:48am
performance-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Mar 17, 2025 10:48am
test-studio	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Mar 17, 2025 10:48am

2 Skipped Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Mar 17, 2025 10:48am
test-next-studio	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Mar 17, 2025 10:48am

[github-actions]

No changes to documentation

[github-actions]

Coverage Report

Status	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🔵	Lines	42.17%	54629 / 129528
🔵	Statements	42.17%	54629 / 129528
🔵	Functions	47.1%	2741 / 5819
🔵	Branches	79.39%	10222 / 12875

File Coverage

No changed files found.

Generated in workflow #32402 for commit 76ada75 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

[github-actions]

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:53:55 GMT

Benchmark	reference latency of sanity@latest	experiment latency of this branch	Δ (%) latency difference
article (title)	26.3 efps (38ms)	25.6 efps (39ms)	+1ms (+2.6%)	✅
article (body)	78.1 efps (13ms)	78.7 efps (13ms)	-0ms (-/-%)	✅
article (string inside object)	26.3 efps (38ms)	27.4 efps (37ms)	-2ms (-3.9%)	✅
article (string inside array)	25.0 efps (40ms)	24.4 efps (41ms)	+1ms (+2.5%)	✅
recipe (name)	47.6 efps (21ms)	47.6 efps (21ms)	+0ms (-/-%)	✅
recipe (description)	52.6 efps (19ms)	52.6 efps (19ms)	+0ms (-/-%)	✅
recipe (instructions)	99.9+ efps (5ms)	99.9+ efps (5ms)	+0ms (-/-%)	✅
synthetic (title)	19.4 efps (52ms)	19.4 efps (52ms)	+0ms (-/-%)	✅
synthetic (string inside object)	20.0 efps (50ms)	20.0 efps (50ms)	+0ms (-/-%)	✅

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark	latency	p75	p90	p99	blocking time	test duration
article (title)	38ms	40ms	43ms	78ms	46ms	9.7s
article (body)	13ms	15ms	16ms	43ms	51ms	4.8s
article (string inside object)	38ms	42ms	47ms	246ms	319ms	7.0s
article (string inside array)	40ms	42ms	44ms	46ms	26ms	6.5s
recipe (name)	21ms	23ms	25ms	46ms	10ms	7.3s
recipe (description)	19ms	20ms	21ms	25ms	0ms	4.6s
recipe (instructions)	5ms	7ms	7ms	9ms	0ms	3.1s
synthetic (title)	52ms	55ms	64ms	347ms	1110ms	12.9s
synthetic (string inside object)	50ms	52ms	55ms	361ms	956ms	7.9s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark	latency	p75	p90	p99	blocking time	test duration
article (title)	39ms	42ms	61ms	338ms	521ms	10.3s
article (body)	13ms	14ms	15ms	41ms	159ms	5.4s
article (string inside object)	37ms	39ms	43ms	103ms	113ms	6.7s
article (string inside array)	41ms	43ms	44ms	49ms	11ms	6.6s
recipe (name)	21ms	23ms	25ms	35ms	0ms	7.6s
recipe (description)	19ms	20ms	21ms	34ms	0ms	4.7s
recipe (instructions)	5ms	6ms	7ms	9ms	0ms	3.1s
synthetic (title)	52ms	55ms	61ms	353ms	1154ms	13.1s
synthetic (string inside object)	50ms	53ms	60ms	488ms	891ms	8.2s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

• benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
• latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
• p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
• p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
• p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
• blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
• test duration — how long the test run took to complete.