Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency @sanity/visual-editing-csm to ^2.0.8 #8909

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 12, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@sanity/visual-editing-csm (source) ^2.0.7 -> ^2.0.8 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

sanity-io/visual-editing (@​sanity/visual-editing-csm)

v2.0.8

Bug Fixes
Dependencies

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every weekday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

Sorry, something went wrong.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner March 12, 2025 16:58
@renovate renovate bot requested review from bjoerge and removed request for a team March 12, 2025 16:58
@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) March 12, 2025 16:58
Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 12, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 12, 2025 9:07pm
performance-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 12, 2025 9:07pm
test-studio ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Mar 12, 2025 9:07pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Mar 12, 2025 9:07pm
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Mar 12, 2025 9:07pm

Copy link
Contributor

No changes to documentation

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 12, 2025

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 42.02% 54448 / 129574
🔵 Statements 42.02% 54448 / 129574
🔵 Functions 46.89% 2729 / 5820
🔵 Branches 79.41% 10207 / 12852
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #32211 for commit d41666f by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 12, 2025

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Wed, 12 Mar 2025 21:14:52 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 18.5 efps (54ms) 21.3 efps (47ms) -7ms (-13.0%)
article (body) 78.1 efps (13ms) 78.1 efps (13ms) +0ms (-/-%)
article (string inside object) 20.0 efps (50ms) 22.2 efps (45ms) -5ms (-10.0%)
article (string inside array) 17.9 efps (56ms) 20.4 efps (49ms) -7ms (-12.5%)
recipe (name) 45.5 efps (22ms) 31.7 efps (32ms) +10ms (+43.2%) 🔴
recipe (description) 51.3 efps (20ms) 34.5 efps (29ms) +10ms (+48.7%) 🔴
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (5ms) 99.9+ efps (5ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 17.2 efps (58ms) 16.7 efps (60ms) +2ms (+3.4%)
synthetic (string inside object) 16.4 efps (61ms) 16.4 efps (61ms) +0ms (-/-%)

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 54ms 77ms 92ms 292ms 1292ms 12.0s
article (body) 13ms 14ms 15ms 29ms 56ms 5.0s
article (string inside object) 50ms 53ms 54ms 175ms 795ms 8.2s
article (string inside array) 56ms 58ms 60ms 65ms 1008ms 8.3s
recipe (name) 22ms 24ms 26ms 45ms 11ms 7.2s
recipe (description) 20ms 21ms 22ms 26ms 0ms 4.7s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 6ms 7ms 9ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 58ms 60ms 63ms 260ms 1686ms 21.7s
synthetic (string inside object) 61ms 64ms 69ms 230ms 1551ms 9.3s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 47ms 77ms 83ms 426ms 849ms 12.3s
article (body) 13ms 14ms 16ms 115ms 165ms 4.9s
article (string inside object) 45ms 47ms 49ms 52ms 77ms 6.8s
article (string inside array) 49ms 55ms 61ms 249ms 386ms 7.8s
recipe (name) 32ms 34ms 35ms 41ms 14ms 8.8s
recipe (description) 29ms 31ms 32ms 45ms 37ms 6.2s
recipe (instructions) 5ms 7ms 7ms 8ms 0ms 3.0s
synthetic (title) 60ms 64ms 74ms 366ms 1934ms 14.1s
synthetic (string inside object) 61ms 63ms 71ms 408ms 1943ms 9.6s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/sanity-visual-editing-csm-2.x branch from 99b22da to f7ac83d Compare March 12, 2025 19:46
Copy link

socket-security bot commented Mar 12, 2025

Removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

🚮 Removed packages: npm/@sanity/visual-editing-csm@2.0.7

View full report↗︎

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/sanity-visual-editing-csm-2.x branch from f7ac83d to d41666f Compare March 12, 2025 20:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant