Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

actions-rs/audit-check GH Action #46

Open
pinkforest opened this issue Aug 6, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

actions-rs/audit-check GH Action #46

pinkforest opened this issue Aug 6, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@pinkforest
Copy link

pinkforest commented Aug 6, 2022

Folk are using this and seems the maintainer @svartalf seems MIA

There seems to be at least one fork already by @djmitche / GothernburgBitFactory:
actions-rs/audit-check#221 (comment)
GothenburgBitFactory/taskwarrior#2830 (comment)

Here:
https://github.com/GothenburgBitFactory/audit-check
Addressing:
actions-rs/audit-check#223

Would it be worthwhile to maintain a fork under GH org until the original maintainer is back

Or maybe we can just add the fork here:
https://github.com/rust-secure-code/projects

In most basic form without any actions alternative always might be something like this - but it's pain to maintain vs action-ref:

    - name: Cache cargo bin
      uses: actions/cache@v1
      with:
        path: ~/.cargo/bin
        key: cargo-audit-v0.17.0

    - name: Install cargo-audit
      run: |
        if [ ! -f $HOME/.cargo/bin/cargo-audit ]; then
            cargo install cargo-audit --vers 0.17.0
        fi
    - name: cargo-audit
      run: cargo audit

There is ofc cargo-deny GH action too:
https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/cargo-deny-action

@tarcieri
Copy link
Member

tarcieri commented Aug 8, 2022

This might be a better question to post at https://github.com/RustSec as it's specifically RustSec-related.

I think it might make sense to fork the action under that org so @rustsec can manage maintenance.

@tarcieri
Copy link
Member

tarcieri commented Aug 8, 2022

Somewhat related issue here: rustsec/rustsec#303

@pinkforest
Copy link
Author

pinkforest commented Aug 8, 2022

I asked @Shnatsel about it yesterday and was supportive as well to under rustsec org

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants