Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Position<Item> -> (Position, Item) #699

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 14, 2023

Conversation

phimuemue
Copy link
Member

As suggested in #651, we could simplify with_position's API by yielding (Position, Item) instead of Position<Item>.

Note: This is a breaking change.

Note: This is a breaking change.
Copy link
Member

@jswrenn jswrenn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors r+

@jswrenn jswrenn added this to the next milestone Jun 14, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jun 14, 2023

Build succeeded!

The publicly hosted instance of bors-ng is deprecated and will go away soon.

If you want to self-host your own instance, instructions are here.
For more help, visit the forum.

If you want to switch to GitHub's built-in merge queue, visit their help page.

@bors bors bot merged commit 878e662 into rust-itertools:master Jun 14, 2023
4 checks passed
@phimuemue phimuemue deleted the with_position branch June 14, 2023 14:39
@jswrenn jswrenn modified the milestones: next, v11.0.0 Nov 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants