Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature process_results as an Itertools method #680

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 22, 2023

Conversation

Philippe-Cholet
Copy link
Member

Fixes #557
I hope it's okay for me to propose an alternative pull request to #587 because it seems stuck for some time: misleading generics names Ok/Err, unnecessary ? higher kinded lifetime.

I will be around to change things if necessary, the documentation maybe, what should I write?

@phimuemue
Copy link
Member

Thanks for this.

bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Mar 22, 2023

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot merged commit baca8c4 into rust-itertools:master Mar 22, 2023
3 checks passed
@jswrenn jswrenn added this to the next milestone Mar 22, 2023
@jswrenn jswrenn modified the milestones: next, v11.0.0 Nov 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

process_results on the Itertools trait
3 participants