Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[QST] Evaluate TargetEncoder implementation vs. scikit-learn #5280

Open
beckernick opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[QST] Evaluate TargetEncoder implementation vs. scikit-learn #5280

beckernick opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
Cython / Python Cython or Python issue question Further information is requested

Comments

@beckernick
Copy link
Member

Support for TargetEncoder was just merged into scikit-learn inspired by the cuML implementation.

We should evaluate the API alignment and functionality across the libraries and how the results compare on various datasets.
@beckernick beckernick added question Further information is requested Cython / Python Cython or Python issue labels Mar 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Cython / Python Cython or Python issue question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@beckernick