Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Deprecate replace with categorical columns #14988

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 9, 2024
Merged

Deprecate replace with categorical columns #14988

merged 3 commits into from Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

mroeschke
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Matches pandas 2.2 behavior: pandas-dev/pandas#56385

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

@mroeschke mroeschke added cuDF (Python) Affects Python cuDF API. improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function breaking Breaking change labels Feb 7, 2024
@mroeschke mroeschke marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2024 21:31
@mroeschke mroeschke requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2024 21:31
@mroeschke
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit fbb1f89 into rapidsai:branch-24.04 Feb 9, 2024
69 checks passed
@mroeschke mroeschke deleted the depr/replace/cat branch February 9, 2024 01:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@isVoid isVoid isVoid approved these changes

@galipremsagar galipremsagar Awaiting requested review from galipremsagar galipremsagar is a code owner automatically assigned from rapidsai/cudf-python-codeowners

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
breaking Breaking change cuDF (Python) Affects Python cuDF API. improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@mroeschke @isVoid