Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: reject invalid ScrapeConfigs #5856

Conversation

simonpasquier
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This is a follow-up of #5841. For the same reason that we didn't continue from the outer loop, invalid ScrapeConfig objects were not rejected.

Type of change

What type of changes does your code introduce to the Prometheus operator? Put an x in the box that apply.

  • CHANGE (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • FEATURE (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • BUGFIX (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • ENHANCEMENT (non-breaking change which improves existing functionality)
  • NONE (if none of the other choices apply. Example, tooling, build system, CI, docs, etc.)

Changelog entry

Please put a one-line changelog entry below. This will be copied to the changelog file during the release process.

reject ScrapeConfig with invalid secret key references.

@simonpasquier simonpasquier requested a review from a team as a code owner August 28, 2023 15:31
This is a follow-up of prometheus-operator#5841. For the same reason that we didn't
continue from the outer loop, invalid ScrapeConfig objects were not
rejected.

Signed-off-by: Simon Pasquier <spasquie@redhat.com>
@simonpasquier simonpasquier merged commit dc98ff6 into prometheus-operator:main Aug 29, 2023
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants