I think that it's the same issue as with the previous prompt issue, as we use the ora spinner there as well and we don't add any options when creating the spinner, so this should be an easy fix.

@waldekmastykarz Something that I noticed too when using the chili command is that the ora spinner also blocks the capability for all the prompts (after I added the discardstdin). So this is another thing that we'd have to research when fixing this. For example; when being prompted for the rating on macOS, it will only show the first two options, and the spinner will be in front of the third option.

@waldekmastykarz Something that I noticed too when using the chili command is that the ora spinner also blocks the capability for all the prompts (after I added the discardstdin). So this is another thing that we'd have to research when fixing this. For example; when being prompted for the rating on macOS, it will only show the first two options, and the spinner will be in front of the third option.

Good catch! Let's dive in and see if we can understand what's changed and how to best fix it

on win + powershell seems to be working 'ok' 🤔

however I noticed a different also wrong behavior that the loader seems to be always present 🤔
https://github.com/pnp/cli-microsoft365/assets/58668583/9500db42-f9ef-42fd-8016-af6b33aa6910

however I noticed a different also wrong behavior that the loader seems to be always present 🤔

Let's create a separate issue for this. Good catch

however I noticed a different also wrong behavior that the loader seems to be always present 🤔

Let's create a separate issue for this. Good catch

That's the issue on why the Spinner is blocking the last prompt too.

@MathijsVerbeeck yes, that's why I think it's kinda connected
Will create a separate issue for that but I hope there will be a single fix for both things

Ok so two things:

1. We will have to change the initialization for the ora spinner so that we add discardStdin: false for macOS, I'd suggest that we initialize the ora object at the top of the code, and we just set the text dynamically before showing the spinner, so it will be something like this:

const spinner = ora({ discardStdin: false });
if (showSpinner) {
   spinner.text = 'Sending rating...';
   spinner.show();
}

2. The request that we are currently executing to call the rating endpoint from mendable is not working. It throws the following error:

https://docs.mendable.ai/mendable-api/rating#body-parameters

Due to this request failing, the spinner will keep showing that we are using when sending the rating request.

In our code we are using the v0 endpoint, while Mendable docs state to use V1 endpoint. Does this make any difference? If not, I can reach out to the Mendable guys to ask which is the best approach here. We can always copy the request from the Mendable button on the site, but if it's not documented, I don't know if we can just use it.

Good catch 😲💪. I think double checking with them over Discord is totally fine 👍

In our code we are using the 10 endpoint, while Mendable docs state to use V1 endpoint. Does this make any difference? If not, I can reach out to the Mendable guys to ask which is the best approach here. We can always copy the request from the Mendable button on the site, but if it's not documented, I don't know if we can just use it.

it does not make a difference it seems

@nickscamara could you guide us in the right direction for this issue, please?

TL;DR: the request we're sending to rate responses is returning a 400 result. Same goes for the request listed in your docs.

@MathijsVerbeeck, I reached out to Mendable, they say we should use a server-key instead of an anon-key. Could you try this key, please?

Can confirm that it works.

@pnp/cli-for-microsoft-365-maintainers Nick from Mendable told me that the server-key I gave Mathijs is more sensitive than the anon-key and we shouldn't expose it. I don't know if there is a way for us to not expose it in Chili...
Either we should:

• Drop rating messages
• Copy the request from the Mendable component on our docs site, which uses an anon-key if I'm not mistaken. Downside: that request is not documented.

I suggest we simplify and drop rating