Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Type narrowed to non-empty-string is not retained by template #9472

Closed
bendavies opened this issue Jun 20, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

Type narrowed to non-empty-string is not retained by template #9472

bendavies opened this issue Jun 20, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@bendavies
Copy link

bendavies commented Jun 20, 2023

Bug report

Hi there,

In the following snippet, I was expecting the dumped type to be non-empty-string, but that is lost somewhere and broadened to string

Thanks!

Code snippet that reproduces the problem

https://phpstan.org/r/15313fea-5813-4d90-89f9-38f27cba1e32

Expected output

Dumped type: non-empty-string

Did PHPStan help you today? Did it make you happy in any way?

Of course. how did we ever code php without it?

@bendavies bendavies changed the title Type narrowed to non-empty-string is not retained Type narrowed to non-empty-string is not retained by template Jun 21, 2023
@stof
Copy link
Contributor

stof commented Jun 21, 2023

My guess is that the native type you have on the function disables type inference from the array_map call for that function.

@dkarlovi
Copy link

It works for class-string so it's specific to non-empty-string.

@ondrejmirtes ondrejmirtes added this to the Generics milestone Jun 21, 2023
@EmielM
Copy link

EmielM commented Jun 28, 2023

This also applies to union of string literals, eg 'a'|'b' that - in template inference - becomes a string.

Simple example: https://phpstan.org/r/529665e1-5525-4b4f-81bf-f1848e852ae8

Our use case where this is often an issue is a generic "tryParse" function: https://phpstan.org/r/12dc41cd-2f6d-4485-ab2c-fdbfb749e067

@stof
Copy link
Contributor

stof commented Jun 28, 2023

Well, in this case, this is quite a good thing though. Otherwise, it would be impossible to make anything else than an identity function for any generic method allowing scalar types for its bound.

@ondrejmirtes
Copy link
Member

Last night I came up with the idea that we mostly shouldn't generalize the generic type variables, except when they're in object generics, like Foo<int>.

Here's the resulting PR: phpstan/phpstan-src#2818

We can't do this for objects, because I want new Collection([1, 2, 3]) to become Collection<int>. This could be improved in the future thanks to this suggestion: #6732 (comment) (but it's pretty complex to implement so for now it has to wait).

The new behaviour now only applies to bleeding edge (https://phpstan.org/blog/what-is-bleeding-edge) so definitely enable it to get the taste of the future 👍

Copy link

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 12, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants