-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: Update gherkin test sub module #1236
test: Update gherkin test sub module #1236
Conversation
…sts definitions Signed-off-by: Bernd Warmuth <bernd.warmuth@dynatrace.com>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1236 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 93.07% 93.26% +0.19%
- Complexity 441 442 +1
============================================
Files 41 41
Lines 1025 1025
Branches 85 85
============================================
+ Hits 954 956 +2
+ Misses 44 43 -1
+ Partials 27 26 -1
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
f7dfb84
to
50b34c8
Compare
src/test/java/dev/openfeature/sdk/e2e/evaluation/StepDefinitions.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Bernd Warmuth <bernd.warmuth@dynatrace.com>
50b34c8
to
7f08771
Compare
[submodule "test-harness"] | ||
path = test-harness | ||
url = https://github.com/open-feature/test-harness | ||
[submodule "spec"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think it's not required to call this spec. Alternatively we could keep calling i "test-harness" (same for path).
no hard feeling there tho. wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i would go with spec, to be more precise, as we are using spec and test-harness in the contrib repos
|
Ah thanks. This has been wrong for a long time. |
This PR
the git submodule pointed to a wrong/old repository.
This PR fixes it by changing the git module to point to the OF spec repository where the gherkin test definitions reside.
Additionally, I've moved the java test definitions into their own package with the motivation to have it nicely separated, e.g. when introducing the next test suite.