Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor/decouple runtime tests #29

Merged
merged 61 commits into from Mar 6, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Magnus-Kuhn
Copy link
Contributor

create helper methods in the testUtils

create helper methods in the testUtils
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 19, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@Magnus-Kuhn Magnus-Kuhn changed the title refactor: decouple iqlQuery tests refactor: decouple runtime tests Feb 22, 2024
@Magnus-Kuhn Magnus-Kuhn changed the title refactor: decouple runtime tests refactor/decouple runtime tests Feb 22, 2024
@slavistan
Copy link
Contributor

In attribute.test.ts:

  1. L67: Why is the event bus of service 3 not reset, too?
  2. L72: In cleanupAttributes() use one nested for-loop over all clients and their respective attributes. Also, I find cleanup unnecessarily vague. We're deleting attributes, simple as that. How about deleteAttributes?

@slavistan
Copy link
Contributor

All tests, except for those mentioned, do run together and in isolation. Great success👍

@Magnus-Kuhn
Copy link
Contributor Author

  1. L72: In cleanupAttributes() use one nested for-loop over all clients and their respective attributes. Also, I find cleanup unnecessarily vague. We're deleting attributes, simple as that. How about deleteAttributes?

I like the previous name hinting at the usage - and as someone who has struggled with excess attributes, I understand cleanup to mean delete

Copy link
Contributor

@slavistan slavistan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not bumping the version since we only changed tests and no implementation code.

@Magnus-Kuhn Magnus-Kuhn merged commit 8ad7d3d into main Mar 6, 2024
16 checks passed
@Magnus-Kuhn Magnus-Kuhn deleted the refactor/decouple-runtime-tests branch March 6, 2024 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants