Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

figure out dependency pinning strategy #109

Open
Remi-Gau opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

figure out dependency pinning strategy #109

Remi-Gau opened this issue May 11, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
_flag:stale [BOT ONLY] Flag issue that hasn't been updated in a while and needs to be triaged again

Comments

@Remi-Gau
Copy link
Contributor

suggestion:

  • another PR to reduce size of requirements.txt
  • if still needed switch to poetry or something else

Originally posted by @Remi-Gau in #104 (comment)

  • for apps we may want to pin if not all at least many dependencies (not just the direct ones)
  • for libraries we may want to only pin our direct dependencies

As a first approach we can in any case trim down our requirements.txt to the minimum and then either keep it that way or freeze all our dependencies depending on what we decide.

@Remi-Gau
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe this issue should be moved to the project level as it may apply to several repos

@Remi-Gau
Copy link
Contributor Author

@github-actions
Copy link

We want to keep our issues up to date and active. This issue hasn't seen any activity in the last 30 days.
We have applied the stale-issue label to indicate that this issue should be reviewed again and then either prioritized or closed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the _flag:stale [BOT ONLY] Flag issue that hasn't been updated in a while and needs to be triaged again label Aug 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
_flag:stale [BOT ONLY] Flag issue that hasn't been updated in a while and needs to be triaged again
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant