Version 2.2.0 #683

jonnyandrew · 2023-05-18T08:31:00Z

No description provided.

codecov-commenter · 2023-05-18T08:45:44Z

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.02 🎉

Comparison is base (a3e4e38) 86.86% compared to head (1d6faed) 86.88%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main     #683      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     86.86%   86.88%   +0.02%     
  Complexity      272      272              
============================================
  Files           143      143              
  Lines         16196    16196              
  Branches        761      762       +1     
============================================
+ Hits          14068    14072       +4     
+ Misses         1940     1936       -4     
  Partials        188      188

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	`65.24% <ø> (ø)`
uitests-android	`65.24% <ø> (ø)`
unittests	`87.68% <ø> (+0.02%)`	⬆️
unittests-android	`58.28% <ø> (ø)`
unittests-ios	`77.75% <ø> (+0.28%)`	⬆️
unittests-rust	`89.77% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

langleyd · 2023-05-18T08:59:11Z

Should we run all tests on releases do you think @jonnyandrew ? Either by adding all the platform tag or adding a release tag and checking it?

jonnyandrew · 2023-05-18T09:10:47Z

Should we run all tests on releases do you think @jonnyandrew ? Either by adding all the platform tag or adding a release tag and checking it?

Yeah I think that's a good idea - hopefully that will stop us accidentally trying to base a release on a broken main branch. Would it make sense to make it automatic rather than remembering to add labels (like f9eff01)?