docs: document model relationships #1905
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The hidden knowledge of Larastan is vast. e.g. the parameter of A hardcore Larastan user must be a (source code reading) contributor too. That is a fact. |
|
Ah yes, I'll add that in there! |
Now we have "only" 4999 secrets 🙃 |
szepeviktor
reviewed
Apr 6, 2024
|
Cool new profile pic @szepeviktor! Does this look good enough to merge? |
canvural
reviewed
Apr 14, 2024
canvural
reviewed
Apr 14, 2024
|
Thank you! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related to #1902
Hello!
This documents that model relationships must be
publicand have their return type defined to be recognized as a relationship to help avoid future confusion.Thanks!