-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update imdario/mergo to v0.3.13 #5342
Update imdario/mergo to v0.3.13 #5342
Conversation
``` ===== ACTUAL BEGIN ======================================== apiVersion: v1 data: config.yaml: "null" kind: ConfigMap metadata: name: issue4905 ===== ACTUAL END ========================================== EXPECTED ACTUAL -------- ------ apiVersion: v1 apiVersion: v1 data: data: X config.yaml: |- config.yaml: "null" X item1: 1 kind: ConfigMap X item2: 2 metadata: X kind: ConfigMap name: issue4905 X metadata: X name: issue4905 hasgett.go:22: Expected not equal to actual --- FAIL: TestHelmChartInflationGeneratorIssue4905 (0.24s) ``` Signed-off-by: Kazuki Suda <kazuki.suda@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Gibuła <krzysztof.gibula@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kazuki Suda <kazuki.suda@gmail.com>
This PR has multiple commits, and the default merge method is: merge. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Welcome @superbrothers! |
Hi @superbrothers. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/ok-to-test |
Hi @superbrothers
I agree that we need more discussion for #5044, and if we merge that, I think we need more test coverage. /lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: koba1t, superbrothers The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This PR adds a small dedicated test case that reproduces the problem for PR #5044.
Fixes #4905