Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-1.4] 🌱 test/e2e: use topology flavor for workload clusters in clusterctl upgrade test #8550

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Apr 24, 2023

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:
Follow-up to #8311 (comment)

To be honest not sure if we need this, but let's clean it up at least for consistency with other tests.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

…rade test

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.4 milestone Apr 24, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 24, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title 🌱 test/e2e: use topology flavor for workload clusters in clusterctl upgrade test [release-1.4] 🌱 test/e2e: use topology flavor for workload clusters in clusterctl upgrade test Apr 24, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-release-1-4

/assign @killianmuldoon
/hold
for green tests

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 24, 2023
@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

Unhold whenever you're happy with the tests.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 24, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: ea3bc394543a634e1a64a684312955e669f7594c

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: killianmuldoon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 24, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 24, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8cb5e78 into kubernetes-sigs:release-1.4 Apr 24, 2023
30 checks passed
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-1.4-clusterctl-upgrade-topology branch April 24, 2023 14:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants