Fix kwargs vs options hash for Ruby 3.0 compatibility

[jasonpenny]

This updates spec files for Ruby 3.0 compatibility where kwargs are expected in the tests, but an options hash is passed.

On the master branch:

$ rbenv shell 3.0.6
$ BUNDLE_GEMFILE=gemfiles/6.1.gemfile bundle install
$ BUNDLE_GEMFILE=gemfiles/6.1.gemfile bundle exec rake spec
...

Failures:

  1) Paperclip::UriAdapter#download_content with custom read_timeout calls open with read_timeout option
     Failure/Error:
       expect(@uri_opener)
         .to receive(:open).with(@uri, read_timeout: 120).at_least(1).times

       URI received :open with unexpected arguments
         expected: (#<URI::HTTPS https://github.com/thoughtbot/paper:clip.jpg>, {:read_timeout=>120}) (keyword arguments)
              got: (#<URI::HTTPS https://github.com/thoughtbot/paper:clip.jpg>, {:read_timeout=>120}) (options hash)
     # ./spec/paperclip/io_adapters/uri_adapter_spec.rb:226:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'

  2) Paperclip Calling Paperclip.run with a logger passes the defined logger if :log_command is set
     Failure/Error: Terrapin::CommandLine.new(cmd, arguments, local_options).run(interpolation_values)

       #<Terrapin::CommandLine (class)> received :new with unexpected arguments
         expected: ("convert", "stuff", {:logger=>#<Logger:0x000000013f6c23a8 @level=0, @progname=nil, @default_formatter=#<Logger::Formatter...ug.log>, @binmode=false, @mon_data=#<Monitor:0x000000013f6c2060>, @mon_data_
owner_object_id=54180>>}) (keyword arguments)
              got: ("convert", "stuff", {:logger=>#<Logger:0x000000013f6c23a8 @level=0, @progname=nil, @default_formatter=#<Logger::Formatter...ug.log>, @binmode=false, @mon_data=#<Monitor:0x000000013f6c2060>, @mon_data_
owner_object_id=54180>>}) (options hash)
     # ./lib/paperclip/helpers.rb:35:in `run'
     # ./spec/paperclip/paperclip_spec.rb:67:in `block (3 levels) in <top (required)>'
...

[mattwd7]

yes plz!

[jasonpenny]

@ssinghi can I get a review on this?

[jasonpenny]

@amanksingh01-kreeti can I get a review on this?