Add support for ITE-6 Attestations #562
Comments
|
@adityasaky Is this ticket ok to pick up? |
|
Hi @chasen-bettinger! We've currently listed it for GSoC. Do you plan to apply through GSoC or pick it up directly? (Either is fine) |
|
@adityasaky I presume GSoC is 'Google Summer of Code'? I don't really know much about that program so probably picking it up directly. |
|
Gotcha! Feel free to jump on the CNCF slack (#in-toto, #in-toto-python) if you have any questions. |
- Added the Statement model - Incorporated the Statement model into the Envelope. - Skipped a test because I'm awaiting feedback on whether this is the right direction to take this issue (in-toto#562). The test is built on the previously-used 'link' model as the payload.
- Added the Statement model - Incorporated the Statement model into the Envelope. - Skipped a test because I'm awaiting feedback on whether this is the right direction to take this issue (in-toto#562). The test is built on the previously-used 'link' model as the payload. Signed-off-by: Chasen Bettinger <bettingerchasen@gmail.com>
|
in-toto doesn't have any methods to generate Also, FYI I have submitted my first draft of proposal on summer of code portal. Please provide me a review. |
- Added the Statement model - Incorporated the Statement model into the Envelope. - Skipped a test because I'm awaiting feedback on whether this is the right direction to take this issue (in-toto#562). The test is built on the previously-used 'link' model as the payload. Signed-off-by: Chasen Bettinger <bettingerchasen@gmail.com>
- Added the Statement model - Incorporated the Statement model into the Envelope. - Skipped a test because I'm awaiting feedback on whether this is the right direction to take this issue (in-toto#562). The test is built on the previously-used 'link' model as the payload. Signed-off-by: Chasen Bettinger <bettingerchasen@gmail.com>
- Added the Statement model - Incorporated the Statement model into the Envelope. - Skipped a test because I'm awaiting feedback on whether this is the right direction to take this issue (in-toto#562). The test is built on the previously-used 'link' model as the payload. Signed-off-by: Chasen Bettinger <bettingerchasen@gmail.com>
- Added the Statement model - Incorporated the Statement model into the Envelope. - Skipped a test because I'm awaiting feedback on whether this is the right direction to take this issue (in-toto#562). The test is built on the previously-used 'link' model as the payload. Signed-off-by: Chasen Bettinger <bettingerchasen@gmail.com>
- Added the Statement model - Incorporated the Statement model into the Envelope. - Skipped a test because I'm awaiting feedback on whether this is the right direction to take this issue (in-toto#562). The test is built on the previously-used 'link' model as the payload. Signed-off-by: Chasen Bettinger <bettingerchasen@gmail.com>
|
👋 hey @chasen-bettinger & @adityasaky -- I'm looking to use the in-toto lib to generate provenance attestations. Is there a place I can jump in to help get this across the line and merged? |
|
Have you taken a look at #570? Also cc @marcelamelara |
Please fill in the fields below to submit an issue or feature request. The
more information that is provided, the better.
Description of issue or feature request:
in-toto-python does not currently support generating ITE-6 attestations. The task can be broken down into the following steps:
The generated metadata can leverage the newly added support for DSSE (#503).
Related: #464, #465, #466
Current behavior:
in-toto-python has no support for generating ITE-6 attestations.
Expected behavior:
in-toto-python can generate ITE-6 attestations with support for some predicate types.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: