feat(resource): Add new docdbelastic_cluster resource

[amacf]

Description

Implements the cluster resource for docdbelastic service

Note that this does not implement the cluster snaphots resource, which will be saved for another PR.

Relations

Closes #29514

References

• SDKv2 API Reference: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/docdbelastic
• AWS API documentation: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/documentdb/latest/developerguide/API_Operations_Amazon_DocumentDB_Elastic_Clusters.html

Output from Acceptance Testing

terraform-provider-aws$ make testacc TESTS=TestAccDocDBElasticCluster PKG=docdbelastic
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/docdbelastic/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20 -run='TestAccDocDBElasticCluster'  -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_basic
=== RUN   TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_disappears
=== CONT  TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_basic
=== CONT  TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_disappears (2379.71s)
--- PASS: TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_basic (2403.25s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/docdbelastic	2403.354s

[github-actions]

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
• Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

• Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
• For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
• Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

[philipleetaylor]

Any updates on when we could expect this merge? My team is eager to adopt elastic doc_dbs

[jtbrush56]

It looks like this code has been done for about 2 months and all checks have passed. Is there an update on when it can be merged in?

[eugenestarchenko]

We do need this too!

[zikphil]

update on this PR?

[lagerfeuer]

Need this too. @johnsonaj, just saw you self-assigned this, will you be taking on this PR? Can you provide an update?

[johnsonaj]

LGTM 🚀

% make testacc TESTARGS="-run=TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_" PKG=docdbelastic

==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/docdbelastic/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20  -run=TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_ -timeout 360m
=== RUN   TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_basic
=== RUN   TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_disappears
=== RUN   TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_tags
=== PAUSE TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_tags
=== RUN   TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_update
=== PAUSE TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_update
=== CONT  TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_basic
=== CONT  TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_tags
=== CONT  TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_update
=== CONT  TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_disappears (2972.00s)
--- PASS: TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_basic (3009.98s)
--- PASS: TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_tags (3022.32s)
--- PASS: TestAccDocDBElasticCluster_update (3856.19s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/docdbelastic	3859.453s

[johnsonaj]

@amacf thank you for the contribution! 🎉

[github-actions]

This functionality has been released in v5.29.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

[github-actions]

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.