Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix: contains regression on string-like objects, #675 #677

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 21, 2024
Merged

fix: contains regression on string-like objects, #675 #677

merged 2 commits into from Mar 21, 2024

Conversation

harttle
Copy link
Owner

@harttle harttle commented Mar 21, 2024

No description provided.

@harttle harttle changed the title fix: contains regression fix: contains regression on string-like objects, #675 Mar 21, 2024
@harttle harttle merged commit 05223c4 into master Mar 21, 2024
13 checks passed
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8377947206

Details

  • 2 of 2 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.001%) to 99.376%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8234214467: 0.001%
Covered Lines: 2261
Relevant Lines: 2270
💛 - Coveralls

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
@semantic-release-bot
chore(release): 10.10.2 [skip ci]
306b070 
## [10.10.2](v10.10.1...v10.10.2) (2024-03-21)

### Bug Fixes

* contains regression ([#677](#677)) ([05223c4](05223c4)), closes [#675](#675)
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 10.10.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@harttle harttle deleted the fix-contains-regression branch March 22, 2024 02:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
released
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@harttle @coveralls