Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement TransparentWrapper for atomic types #1011

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2024

Conversation

joshlf
Copy link
Member

@joshlf joshlf commented Mar 3, 2024

Makes progress on #1009

@joshlf joshlf requested a review from jswrenn March 3, 2024 21:37
@joshlf joshlf closed this Mar 3, 2024
@joshlf joshlf reopened this Mar 3, 2024
@joshlf joshlf changed the base branch from main to transparent-wrapper-trait-impls March 3, 2024 21:38
@joshlf joshlf changed the title Transparent wrapper atomics Implement TransparentWrapper for atomic types Mar 3, 2024
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the transparent-wrapper-atomics branch from 9d2533a to 51c7210 Compare March 3, 2024 22:10
Base automatically changed from transparent-wrapper-trait-impls to main March 4, 2024 04:23
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the transparent-wrapper-atomics branch from 51c7210 to db382f0 Compare March 4, 2024 17:55
@joshlf joshlf force-pushed the transparent-wrapper-atomics branch from db382f0 to 647d8f1 Compare March 4, 2024 18:02
@joshlf joshlf requested a review from jswrenn March 4, 2024 18:03
@joshlf joshlf enabled auto-merge March 4, 2024 18:06
@joshlf joshlf added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 4, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 2a787c1 Mar 4, 2024
210 checks passed
@joshlf joshlf deleted the transparent-wrapper-atomics branch March 4, 2024 18:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants