Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add protogetter linter #4069

Merged
merged 11 commits into from Oct 9, 2023
Merged

add protogetter linter #4069

merged 11 commits into from Oct 9, 2023

Conversation

ghostiam
Copy link
Contributor

@ghostiam ghostiam commented Sep 6, 2023

ProtoGetter analyzes code and helps detect direct protobuf field accesses that could give rise to panic.

The linter suggests using getters:

m.GetFoo().GetBar().GetBaz()

instead of direct field access:

m.Foo.Bar.Baz

A little more information: golang/protobuf#54 (comment)

Examples:

With getters:

// If one of the methods returns `nil` we will receive 0 instead of panic.
m.GetFoo().GetBar().GetBaz().GetInt() 

With fileds:

// If at least one structure in the chains is not initialized, we will get a panic. 
m.Foo.Bar.Baz.Int

@boring-cyborg
Copy link

boring-cyborg bot commented Sep 6, 2023

Hey, thank you for opening your first Pull Request !

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Sep 6, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@ghostiam ghostiam marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2023 20:31
@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Sep 6, 2023

In order for a pull request adding a linter to be reviewed, the linter and the PR must follow some requirements.

  • The CLA must be signed

Pull Request Description

  • It must have a link to the linter repository.
  • It must provide a short description of the linter.

Linter

  • It must not be a duplicate of another linter or a rule of a linter. (the team will help to verify that)
  • It must have a valid license (AGPL is not allowed) and the file must contain the required information by the license, ex: author, year, etc.
  • The linter repository must have a CI and tests.
  • It must use go/analysis.
  • It must have a valid tag, ex: v1.0.0, v0.1.0.
  • It must not contain init().
  • It must not contain panic().
  • It must not contain log.fatal(), os.exit(), or similar.
  • It must not modify the AST.
  • It must not have false positives/negatives. (the team will help to verify that)
  • It must have tests inside golangci-lint.

The Linter Tests Inside Golangci-lint

  • They must have at least one std lib import.
  • They must work with T=<name of the linter test file>.go make test_linters. (the team will help to verify that)

.golangci.reference.yml

  • The linter must be added to the list of available linters (alphabetical case-insensitive order).
    • enable and disable options
  • If the linter has a configuration, the exhaustive configuration of the linter must be added (alphabetical case-insensitive order)
    • The values must be different from the default ones.
    • The default values must be defined in a comment.
    • The option must have a short description.

Others Requirements

  • The files (tests and linter) inside golangci-lint must have the same name as the linter.
  • The .golangci.yml of golangci-lint itself must not be edited and the linter must not be added to this file.
  • The linters must be sorted in the alphabetical order (case-insensitive) in the Manager.GetAllSupportedLinterConfigs(...) and .golangci.reference.yml.
  • The load mode (WithLoadMode(...)):
    • if the linter doesn't use types: goanalysis.LoadModeSyntax
    • goanalysis.LoadModeTypesInfo required WithLoadForGoAnalysis() in the Manager.GetAllSupportedLinterConfigs(...)
  • The version in WithSince(...) must be the next minor version (v1.X.0) of golangci-lint.
  • WithURL() must contain the URL of the repository.

Recommendations

  • The linter should not use SSA. (SSA can be a problem with generics)
  • The linter repository should have a readme and linting.
  • The linter should be published as a binary. (useful to diagnose bug origins)

The golangci-lint team will edit this comment to check the boxes before and during the review.

The code review will start after the completion of those checkboxes (except for the specific items that the team will help to verify).

If the author of the PR is a member of the golangci-lint team, he should not edit this message.

This checklist does not imply that we will accept the linter.

@ldez ldez added linter: new Support new linter blocked Need's direct action from maintainer labels Sep 6, 2023
@ldez
Copy link
Member

ldez commented Sep 6, 2023

FYI 0.0.x are not semver complaint because a bug fix cannot happen before a minor release or an impossible initial version v0.0.0.

PATCH version when you make backward compatible bug fixes

https://semver.org/

How should I deal with revisions in the 0.y.z initial development phase?

The simplest thing to do is start your initial development release at 0.1.0 and then increment the minor version for each subsequent release.

https://semver.org/#how-should-i-deal-with-revisions-in-the-0yz-initial-development-phase

@ghostiam
Copy link
Contributor Author

ghostiam commented Sep 6, 2023

@ldez I fixed the version

@ldez ldez added feedback required Requires additional feedback and removed blocked Need's direct action from maintainer labels Sep 6, 2023
Copy link
Member

@ldez ldez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

some elements don't fit our checklist (see my previous message)

go.mod Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@ghostiam
Copy link
Contributor Author

ghostiam commented Sep 6, 2023

The files (tests and linter) inside golangci-lint must have the same name as the linter.

Because my linter tests require a dependency on protobuf, the test is in
test/testdata/protogolint/protogolint.go with go.mod and go.sum
instead of
test/testdata/protogolint.go

They must have at least one std lib import.

I'm importing fmt

They must work with T=.go make test_linters. (the team will help to verify that)

T=protogolint make test_linters
GL_TEST_RUN=1 go test -v ./test -count 1 -run TestSourcesFromTestdata/protogolint
=== RUN   TestSourcesFromTestdata
    linters_test.go:21: testdata/*.go
--- PASS: TestSourcesFromTestdata (0.20s)
=== RUN   TestSourcesFromTestdataSubDir
=== RUN   TestSourcesFromTestdataSubDir/protogolint
    linters_test.go:40: testdata/protogolint/*.go
=== RUN   TestSourcesFromTestdataSubDir/protogolint/protogolint.go
=== PAUSE TestSourcesFromTestdataSubDir/protogolint/protogolint.go
=== CONT  TestSourcesFromTestdataSubDir/protogolint/protogolint.go
level=info msg="[test] ran [<redacted>/src/github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/golangci-lint run --internal-cmd-test --no-config --allow-parallel-runners --disable-all --out-format=json --max-same-issues=100 -Eprotogolint protogolint.go] in  485.652333ms"
level=info msg="[test] ran [<redacted>/src/github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/golangci-lint run --internal-cmd-test --no-config --allow-parallel-runners --disable-all --out-format=json --max-same-issues=100 -Etypecheck -Eprotogolint protogolint.go] in  229.036959ms"
--- PASS: TestSourcesFromTestdataSubDir (0.91s)
    --- PASS: TestSourcesFromTestdataSubDir/protogolint (0.19s)
        --- PASS: TestSourcesFromTestdataSubDir/protogolint/protogolint.go (0.72s)
PASS
ok      github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/test  2.295s

@ldez ldez added enhancement New feature or improvement and removed feedback required Requires additional feedback labels Sep 18, 2023
@ldez ldez self-requested a review September 20, 2023 19:33
@Antonboom
Copy link
Contributor

Antonboom commented Oct 3, 2023

ghostiam/protogetter#1

@ghostiam ghostiam changed the title add linter: protogolint add linter: protogetter Oct 4, 2023
@ldez ldez removed the enhancement New feature or improvement label Oct 9, 2023
Copy link
Member

@ldez ldez left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ldez ldez changed the title add linter: protogetter add protogetter linter Oct 9, 2023
@ldez ldez merged commit 8c178d3 into golangci:master Oct 9, 2023
11 checks passed
@ldez ldez modified the milestone: v1.55 Mar 4, 2024
@ldez ldez added the enhancement New feature or improvement label Apr 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or improvement linter: new Support new linter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants