Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run more CI checks on 2.0 branch #2625

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jan 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

sentrivana
Copy link
Contributor

@sentrivana sentrivana commented Jan 8, 2024

Some CI checks aren't running on the sentry-sdk-2.0 branch (and PRs against it) yet (see e.g. #2596).

  • Run all relevant workflows on sentry-sdk-2.0
  • Fix lint step failures caused by a dependency update

General Notes

Thank you for contributing to sentry-python!

Please add tests to validate your changes, and lint your code using tox -e linters.

Running the test suite on your PR might require maintainer approval. Some tests (AWS Lambda) additionally require a maintainer to add a special label to run and will fail if the label is not present.

For maintainers

Sensitive test suites require maintainer review to ensure that tests do not compromise our secrets. This review must be repeated after any code revisions.

Before running sensitive test suites, please carefully check the PR. Then, apply the Trigger: tests using secrets label. The label will be removed after any code changes to enforce our policy requiring maintainers to review all code revisions before running sensitive tests.

@sentrivana sentrivana changed the base branch from master to sentry-sdk-2.0 January 8, 2024 14:55
@sentrivana sentrivana changed the base branch from sentry-sdk-2.0 to master January 8, 2024 14:55
@sentrivana sentrivana merged commit 6f41823 into master Jan 9, 2024
123 checks passed
@sentrivana sentrivana deleted the ivana/run-more-ci-on-2.0-branch branch January 9, 2024 08:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants