Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Make sure that getSession exists before calling it #3017

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2020

Conversation

kamilogorek
Copy link
Contributor

@kamilogorek kamilogorek commented Oct 29, 2020

This can happen when malformed node_modules are using older version of hub, but core wants to call that method. Or when there are 2 versions of Sentry living next to each other for some unknown reason. Fix is straightforward enough that I'm fine to include it, and we already got 2 customers reporting this issue.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

size-limit report

Path Size
@sentry/browser - CDN Bundle (gzipped) 19.63 KB (+0.04% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - Webpack 20.47 KB (+0.02% 🔺)
@sentry/react - Webpack 20.47 KB (+0.02% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - CDN Bundle (gzipped) 26.62 KB (+0.03% 🔺)

Copy link
Member

@lobsterkatie lobsterkatie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kamilogorek kamilogorek merged commit bd6028a into master Oct 29, 2020
@kamilogorek kamilogorek deleted the fix-get-session branch October 29, 2020 14:53
@rpastorelle
Copy link

rpastorelle commented Nov 3, 2020

👋 we upgraded to 5.27.2 this week and we see this issue currently.

Wondering if this didn't quite fix (seems like it should have 🤷)

Screen Shot 2020-11-03 at 2 22 36 PM

Or maybe this fix hasn't been pushed everywhere yet? It doesn't seem to be in https://browser.sentry-cdn.com/5.27.2/bundle.min.js

@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ export abstract class BaseClient<B extends Backend, O extends Options> implement
throw new SentryError('`beforeSend` returned `null`, will not send event.');
}

const session = scope && scope.getSession();
const session = scope && scope.getSession && scope.getSession();
Copy link

@MrChocolatine MrChocolatine Nov 9, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about simply using ?.? (same comment for the second file in this PR)

const session = scope && scope.getSession?.();

Is its compatibility enough for you?
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Optional_chaining#Browser_compatibility

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, we could do that, as we're compiling it down to ES5 anyway. Good catch.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For that matter, couldn't we just do

const session = scope?.getSession?.();

?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants