Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dencun Interop Testing Call #28 #839

Closed
timbeiko opened this issue Jul 31, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

Dencun Interop Testing Call #28 #839

timbeiko opened this issue Jul 31, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator

timbeiko commented Jul 31, 2023

Meeting Info

📆 Subscribe to the Ethereum Protocol Call calendar for calendar invites

4844 Readiness Checklist

Agenda

@jochem-brouwer
Copy link
Member

jochem-brouwer commented Aug 3, 2023

Not sure if implicit, but at #836 we discussed EIP 4788 what should be covered by this call:

  1. agree to a deployment scheme (as part of the fork or manually before)
  2. agree to a first contract implementation to use and
  3. have a PR to the 4788 spec reflecting this

(Quoting @timbeiko from discord with slightly altered formatting)

(My opinions below:)

I think the main discussion here will be about (1). (2) can be discussed asynchronously but in a solidity implementation (e.g. https://gist.github.com/holiman/83500097c6497336950817e869082c18) this should not be too hard (of course, audit part will be) and (3) this should be the result of the call and we should appoint someone who makes this change PR.

(Also note: currently super in favour of implementing 4788 in EVM, but I think deployment scheme, especially regarding cross-chain deployment is currently a problem and we should discuss)

Another side note: note sure if everyone is super aware of this call regarding 4788, this also seems (to me) like a semi-EL call, so please ping people!

@yperbasis
Copy link
Member

Shall we also discuss the eth/68 encoding issue?

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

timbeiko commented Aug 7, 2023

Added @yperbasis !

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closed in favor of #851

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants