Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execution Layer Meeting 166 #834

Closed
timbeiko opened this issue Jul 18, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Execution Layer Meeting 166 #834

timbeiko opened this issue Jul 18, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@shemnon
Copy link
Contributor

shemnon commented Jul 18, 2023

please add EIP-6780 SELFDESTRUCT clarifications - ethereum/EIPs#7308

@gcolvin
Copy link

gcolvin commented Jul 19, 2023

ethereum/EIPs#7230

This is a complement and/or alternative to eip-7329. It proposes fixes for a number of pain points, most of them unrelated to splitting the repo:

  • getting a Draft into the repo in the first place
  • editing a document while complying with changing rules
  • referencing relevant resources that aren't specifically allowed
  • ensuring that all referenced resources remain accessible
  • assuring that the many Drafts we edit are technically sound and of high quality
  • integrating the EIP process with the Reference Implementations and Core Devs workflows.

On the last item, we propose that the Editors treat the Core Devs as an "official" Working Group, since de-facto they already are. We want to better separate the responsibilities and workflow of the Editors and Core Developers, affirming that that the devs can work in whatever repo they want, with whatever workflow they want, with more discretion over the form of their specifications.

@abcoathup
Copy link

A name is needed for the combined EL + CL upgrade (Prague + Electra)
https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/name-needed-for-combined-el-cl-prague-electra-upgrade/15122

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Added @gcolvin @abcoathup

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closed in favour of #836

Santhosh1692 added a commit to Santhosh1692/pm-1 that referenced this issue Jul 23, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants