-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test(ctb): small cleanup and stronger assertions #9404
Conversation
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe updates across various contract and test files in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
fb80988
to
4c15d03
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #9404 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 16.57% 29.57% +13.00%
============================================
Files 119 31 -88
Lines 5098 2806 -2292
Branches 1130 594 -536
============================================
- Hits 845 830 -15
+ Misses 4178 1901 -2277
Partials 75 75
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice
Test changes:
vm.expectRevert()
usage (which allows any revert data) with more targeted revert data. We usevm.expectRevert(bytes(""))
to specify when we expect no revert datasuccess
status of low-level callsSource changes:
DelayedVetoable
. Since this contract is not live yet, this change seemed ok