Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove overly aggressive stale bot #185

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 28, 2024

Conversation

JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link

Fixes #164.

IMO it would be better to have a dedicated label to indicate that an issue or PR is waiting on the author. In that case we could use the only-labels option instead of removing the action altogether.

@ota-meshi
Copy link
Member

I think it's okay to remove the stale workflow for now.
@MichaelDeBoey What do you think about this change?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 18, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (e0f326f) 97.87% compared to head (89109c6) 97.87%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #185   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.87%   97.87%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines         282      282           
=======================================
  Hits          276      276           
  Misses          6        6           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@MichaelDeBoey MichaelDeBoey merged commit 73811aa into eslint-community:main Feb 28, 2024
18 checks passed
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg deleted the remove-stale branch February 28, 2024 20:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bot marks issues as stale without notifying the author beforehand
3 participants