Add support for consumers using Node ES Module support (e.g. type=module
in package.json
)
#544
+49
−5
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds support for Ember addons that opt-in to node's ES module syntax via
type=module.
When writing to a directory whose package.json is controlled by a third
party, maximum compatibility is achieved by writing either
.cjs
or.mjs
files as appropriate, and not
.js
files.If neither package is concerned with backwards compatibility, writing ES
modules into a
.js
file can be fine, but writing commonjs modules intoa
.js
file in a directory whose package.json is controlled by a thirdparty (e.g. another package) is not generally going to be
forwards-compatible.
See also ember-cli/ember-cli#10053 (comment)
Co-authored-by: Robert Jackson rjackson@linkedin.com